-
aaronrussell created a boo
26 August 2009
-
aaronrussell created a boo
24 June 2009
-
aaronrussell followed angstmann
20 May 2009
-
aaronrussell followed spongeproject
20 May 2009
-
-
aaronrussell favourited a boo
20 May 2009
-
aaronrussell followed robhawkes
20 May 2009
-
aaronrussell created a boo
20 May 2009
play0:00 / 2:42aaronrussell likes this.-
Duckz Eee iiii eeee iiii ooooo lol!
-
aaronrussell Oooh, arrgh matey ;)
-
Duckz I agree that consistency is important - it certainly makes life easier when dealing with a big website. Just realised from you accent that your just down the road in Swindon!
-
-
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
-
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
-
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
-
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
291.761 like -
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
-
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
223.031 like -
aaronrussell favourited a boo
19 May 2009
154.411 like -
aaronrussell created a boo
19 May 2009
-
aaronrussell created a boo
22 April 2009
-
aaronrussell followed Stephen Fry
21 April 2009
-
aaronrussell commented on a boo
21 April 2009
“Fair enough Japh, I do respect your opinion on the matter, but I think we'll have to agree to disagree with each other :) Fundamentally, for me it's an issue of ethics so you're going to find it difficult to sway me. On the other point about IE6's remaining life-cycle, I suppose where it goes from now is anybodies guess? My prediction of it being of no concern by this time next year is based on the rumours going round of Microsoft dropping support for Win2K (and therefore IE6) early next year. If that's true (which it might not be) then we can expect corps still using win2K to start getting their asses in gear some time soon. From my point of view, as soon as IE6 use drops below 2 or 3 percent then it's really not worth losing any sleep over, and it's feasible that could happen by the middle of next year? But perhaps I am being hopeful :)” -
aaronrussell followed johnonolan
20 April 2009
-
aaronrussell created a boo
20 April 2009
play0:00 / 2:06aaronrussell likes this.-
aaronrussell Fair enough Japh, I do respect your opinion on the matter, but I think we'll have to agree to disagree with each other :) Fundamentally, for me it's an issue of ethics so you're going to find it difficult to sway me. On the other point about IE6's remaining life-cycle, I suppose where it goes from now is anybodies guess? My prediction of it being of no concern by this time next year is based on the rumours going round of Microsoft dropping support for Win2K (and therefore IE6) early next year. If that's true (which it might not be) then we can expect corps still using win2K to start getting their asses in gear some time soon. From my point of view, as soon as IE6 use drops below 2 or 3 percent then it's really not worth losing any sleep over, and it's feasible that could happen by the middle of next year? But perhaps I am being hopeful :)
-
Japh Hi Aaron, So sorry! I was only just alerted to your 'boo! I missed it somehow... Anyway, I still rather disagree with you that users would be bothered by this behaviour. Most security software does similar things. It's not deception, it's using a visual cue that user's are familiar with to communicate that they ought to take action and upgrade. Which is precisely the case! Else why would Microsoft have released IE7 as a high importance security update? Yes it looks like a warning message, because it is one, and yes it emulates Microsoft warning messages... because it's about Microsoft software. But I doubt user's are going to click it, download IE8 and upgrade, and then turn around and say "Hang on! I've been tricked into upgrading my software to the latest version!!" and get mad ;) Also, I wish I could agree with you about IE6 only having a few months left in it... Corporates will still be using IE6 this time next year, I guarantee you. But hopefully, they'll be well into testing later version on their SOEs and rolling them out across their networks by late next year! :D
-
-
aaronrussell followed richardpbacon
19 April 2009
-
aaronrussell commented on a boo
19 April 2009
177.34Should Communities Be Moderated?
about 4 years ago1240047316 North Dorset, Dorset, United Kingdom
“I've noticed a few very abusive boos being targeted at other users. What seems to happening is two different crowds are using AudioBoo. On the one side there are people using it as a kind of instant audio chat service, where users can meet each other, have a bit of banter, maybe a bit of flirting, and generally have some fun. And that's all cool with me :) However, on the other side people are using the service like yourself, as another channel through which to communicate with their existing audience, covering very varied niche topics. So naturally, the people from the first crowd are going to find someone who's harping on for 4 minutes about web design really boring making them a target for abuse. A couple of possible suggestions might be to opt out of having boos published to the 'public timeline', or maybe the introduction of channels so people can hang out with people sharing their interests and reasons for using AudioBoo.” -
aaronrussell followed Japh
17 April 2009
-
aaronrussell followed darekrossman
16 April 2009
-
aaronrussell created a boo
16 April 2009
-
aaronrussell followed Brandjoe
16 April 2009
-
aaronrussell created a boo
15 April 2009
-
aaronrussell followed mandle
15 April 2009
aaronrussell commented on a boo
20 May 2009
Design To A Grid And Be Consistent
aaronrussell
about 4 years ago1242834986